Claire Hoy Settlement is Significant
Special Editorial Section
by Ken Popert
TORONTO — The freedom of working journalists to publicly
criticize the journalistic ethics of their employers has got a foot in
the courtroom door. And one of Canada's biggest news-gathering
operations has lost a three-year battle to go on shaping the news in
secrecy. These are the unwritten terms of settlement of a grievance
filed with The Toronto
Star by the Toronto Newspaper Guild on behalf of former Star reporter
Claire Hoy, who now is a political columnist for The Toronto Sun.
The grievance was filed after the Star fired Hoy in
October, 1974 and sued him for libel. These actions were the Star's response to
two televised interviews — one carried nationally by the CBC and one locally
by Toronto's CITY—in
which Hoy said the daily was slanting its news coverage of the federal
election campaign then in progress.
In May, 1975 the Star secured from
the board of arbitration — assembled under the Ontario Labour
Relations Act a ruling that the proceedings would be held in secret.
The Guild, however, appealed that decision and it was overturned bv the
Divisional Court of the Supreme Court of Ontario in February of this
Having lost the judicial war to make the newsroom
safe for secrecy, the Star
turned to other means. According to Hoy, the newspaper offered to
settle on two occasions, once on condition that the agreement be kept
secret and once on condition that the settlement be made without
prejudice, which would have meant that the case could not be cited as a
precedent in future disputes between journalists and management. The
Guild rejected both conditions.
The strength of the Star's thirst for
secrecy in the case can be measured by the terms of the settlement. The
newspaper capitulated right across the board, giving in to every one of
the Guild's conditions for settlement. In return, according to Guild
executive secretary John P. Bryant, the Star received
nothing. But by settling, the Star
did preclude a public hearing of the case.
In the settlement the Star agreed:
- To allow Hoy to resign and collect severance pay. (The amount of the severance pay due Hoy was not available at the time of writing.)
- To provide Hoy with a letter of recommendation testifying to his competence and professionalism as a journalist,
- To remove all reference to the case from Hoy's employment record, and
- To pay court costs incurred in the Guild's appeal of the arbitration board's decision to hear the case in secret.
Star has also abandoned its libel suit against Hoy.
Talking about his televised revelations of three
years ago, Hoy says: "If people in this business saw someone screwing
around in another business, they'd think it was a hell of a story.
Well, the same applies to that story.
"I figured they were big enough to take some
criticism. I guess I was wrong. But I had my facts; the settlement
Early on, when it seemed to be winning, the Star covered its dispute with Hoy. Apologies from the CBC and CITY for broadcasting Hoy's embarrassing revelations made the daily's news pages. But Star editors haven't found the case newsworthy of late: Star readers haven't been told about the settlement.
To Canada's fattest daily, humble pie is still a foreign delicacy.
Published in Content's SOURCES December 1977
Sources, 812A Bloor Street West,
Suite 201, Toronto, ON M6G 1L9.
Phone: (416) 964-7799 FAX: (416) 964-8763
Directory Include yourself
Mailing Lists and
Names & Numbers Sources Calendar
Names & Numbers