|
Centre for Investigative Journalism
Annual Convention: Individual Reports
ENVIROMENT
by Abrey Myers
Acid
rain is another case of material waiting for someone to pick it up and
put it together.
Lloyd Tataryn
LLOYD TATARYN, AUTHOR OF Dying For A
Living, noted two problems confronting journalists who
cover
environmental topics: a lack of original research by the reporters
themselves and a tendency to wait for someone else to pull all the
information together for them.
When researching material for his chapter on
aluminum dusting of
uranium miners in Ontario, Tataryn discovered that the practice had
been banned in Britain, Sweden and South Africa. In Canada Tataryn
found reporters who knew about the story, "but, because no one had
conducted a report describing the potential harmful effects of this
process, no one bothered to report it."
After his story was broadcast on The Fifth Estate,
a federal
investigation was launched. A report was handed down in mid-March which
recommended banning the process because there is no evidence that it is
beneficial.
Tataryn's second point—corroborate
official data with your own
independent study to see if it clicks—was demonstrated by his
story of arsenic contamination in Yellovvknife. A government
hair-sample study conducted on a volunteer basis was flawed for four
reasons: the people who were sick could not come forward; surveys of
this kind tended to attract kooks; it missed people from lower economic
groups (in this case, Indian reservation children living within the
shadow of the arsenic-emitting smokestacks); and there was no control
group used.
Tataryn secured additional hair samples, which
were
given to scientists at the University of Toronto for blind
analysis (they weren't told what the samples were for). The
results led to
another government investigation, which resulted in an 80 per cent
reduction of arsenic levels from the plant involved and the
establishment of an arsenic standard in Canada.
Gilles Provost, of Le Devoir,
works with written documents because he doesn't have all that great
a memory for faces and names. Provost agreed with
other members on the panel: no one bothers to look into the scientific
data. The universities are untapped sources of information, he said, a theme that was
echoed in
other workshops throughout the Conference. (Provost's story, "Ballast
Metal: La rentabilité avant la santé," was reprinted in the CIJ's
Review.)
Ross Howard of the Toronto Star said
he never heard of acid rain until
1977, when a California college put out a list of the ten most
covered-up stories of the year. It's another case of the material
waiting for someone to pick it up and put it together. "It's a national
story," said Howard, "and we're still at the stage where the feds deny
everything but the death of a few lakes and the (Ontario) provincial
government is denying anything but a few lakes and maybe a few trees,
and perhaps a few crops."
We may be seven years behind the Swedes, but it's
all there, in the scientific literature and in the student reports, too.
Howard discovered that there are scientists
working within the
government whose departments are constantly competing for money. "The
scientists who worry about the quality of the air weren't getting as
much money as the scientists who worry about the quality of the water."
The tactic was to uncover the source of tension—the jealousy
between government departments—and play them against each
other
to his own advantage.
Howard urged listeners not to ignore students who
do research papers
for their professors, taking up to seven or eight months to compile
their data.
Howard devoted much of his talk to good and bad
sources
for future
researchers. The best U.S. source for information and quotes on
environmental issues is Senator Ed Muskie; the best American
environmental interest group is the Environmental Defense Fund; the
best in Canada were the Canadian Environmental Law Association and the
relevant federal government clipping services ("better than CP").
Howard has found Environment Canada so-so as a source. It has material,
but you have to know to whom to speak and what you're looking for. One
of their branches, the Atmospheric Environmental Service, in Downsview,
Ont., is good, but watch for jealousy patterns. Energy, Mines and
Resources?—I have little use for
them.
Published in Sources May/June 1980
Sources, 812A Bloor Street West,
Suite 201, Toronto, ON M6G 1L9.
Phone: (416) 964-7799 FAX: (416) 964-8763
E-Mail:

www.sources.com
The Sources
Directory Include yourself
in Sources
Mailing Lists and
Databases
Media
Names & Numbers Sources Calendar
News Releases
HotLink.ca
Parliamentary
Names & Numbers
|