Night of the Long Knives
Although the German public did not complain much when SA
activities were directed against Jews
, and Socialists
, by 1934 there was general concern about the level of civic violence for which the "brown shirts" were responsible.
The Night of the Long Knives (German: Nacht der langen Messer (helpâ·info)) or "Operation Hummingbird", or, more commonly used in Germany "RÃ¶hm-Putsch" was a purge that took place in Nazi Germany between June 30 and July 2, 1934, when the Nazi regime carried out a series of political executions. Most of those killed were members of the Sturmabteilung (SA), the paramilitary Brownshirts.
Adolf Hitler moved against the SA and its leader, Ernst RÃ¶hm, because he saw the independence of the SA and the penchant of its members for street violence as a direct threat to his power. He also wanted to conciliate leaders of the Reichswehr, the official German military who both feared and despised the SAâ€”in particular RÃ¶hm's ambition to absorb the Reichswehr into the SA under his own leadership. Finally, Hitler used the purge to attack or eliminate critics of his regime, especially those loyal to Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, and to settle scores with old enemies.
At least 85 people died during the purge, although the final death toll may have been in the hundreds, and more than a thousand perceived opponents were arrested. Most of the killings were carried out by the Schutzstaffel (SS) and the Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei), the regime's secret police. The purge strengthened and consolidated the support of the Reichswehr for Hitler. It also provided a legal grounding for the Nazi regime, as the German courts and cabinet quickly swept aside centuries of legal prohibition against extra-judicial killings to demonstrate their loyalty to the regime.
Before its execution, its planners sometimes referred to it as "Hummingbird" (German: Kolibri), as that was the codeword used to set the execution squads in motion on the day of the purge. The codename for the operation appears to have been chosen arbitrarily. The phrase "Night of the Long Knives" in the German language predates the massacre itself, and it also refers generally to acts of vengeance. To this day, Germans still use the term "RÃ¶hm-Putsch" ("RÃ¶hm coup dâ€™Ã©tat") to describe the event, as that was the term the Nazi regime used at the time, despite its overall false implication that the murders were necessary to forestall a coup. To emphasise this, German authors often use quotation marks or write about the so-called RÃ¶hm-Putsch.
 Hitler and the Sturmabteilung (SA)
Hitler posing in Nuremberg
with SA members in the late 1920s; Hermann GÃ¶ring is pictured beneath Hitler, wearing medals.
President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor on January 30, 1933. Over the next few months, during the so-called Gleichschaltung, Hitler dispensed with the need for the Reichstag as a legislative body and eliminated all rival political parties in Germany so that by the middle of 1933, the country had become a one-party state under his direction and control. Hitler did not exercise absolute power, however, despite his swift consolidation of political authority. As chancellor, Hitler did not command the army, which remained under the formal leadership of Hindenburg, a highly respected veteran Field Marshal, albeit increasingly frail and senile. While many officers were impressed by Hitler's promises of an expanded army, a return to conscription, and a more aggressive foreign policy, the army continued to guard its traditions of independence during the early years of the Nazi regime.
To a lesser extent, the Sturmabteilung (SA), a Nazi paramilitary organisation, remained somewhat autonomous within the party itself. The SA evolved out of the remnants of the Freikorps movement of the post-WWI years. The Freikorps were nationalistic organisations primarily composed of disaffected, disenchanted, and angry German combat veterans who believed that their government had betrayed Germany and sold them out by surrendering and submitting to the humiliating terms of the Versailles Treaty. The Freikorps were in opposition to the new Weimar Republic. Ernst RÃ¶hm was commander of the Bavarian Freikorps and was given the nickname "The Machine Gun King of Bavaria" because he was responsible for storing and issuing illegal machine guns to Freikorps units in Bavaria. He later became commander of the SA. During the 1920s and 1930s the SA functioned as a private militia that Hitler used to intimidate rivals and disrupt the meetings of competing political parties, especially those of the Social Democrats and the Communists. Also known as the "brownshirts" or "stormtroopers", the SA became notorious for their street battles with the Communists. The violent confrontations between the two groups contributed to the destabilisation of Germany's inter-war experiment with democracy, the Weimar Republic. In June 1932, one of the worst months of political violence, there were over 400 street battles, resulting in 82 deaths. This very destabilisation had been crucial in Hitler's rise to power, however, not least because it convinced many Germans that once Hitler became chancellor, the endemic street violence would end.
Hitler's appointment as chancellor, followed by the suppression of all political parties except the Nazis, curtailed but did not end the violence of the stormtroopers. Deprived of Communist party meetings to disrupt, but inured to â€“ and seduced by â€“ violence, the stormtroopers would sometimes run riot in German streets after a night of drinking. Very often they would beat up passers-by, and then attack the police who were called to stop them. Complaints of "overbearing and loutish" behavior by stormtroopers were common by the middle of 1933. Even the Foreign Office complained of instances of brownshirts manhandling foreign diplomats. Such behavior disturbed the German middle classes and other conservative elements in society, such as the army.
Hitler's next move would be to strengthen his position with the army by moving against its nemesis, the SA. On July 6, 1933, at a gathering of high-ranking Nazi officials, Hitler declared the success of the National Socialist, or Nazi, revolution. Now that the NSDAP had seized the reins of power in Germany, he said, it was time to consolidate its hold. As Hitler told the gathered officials, "The stream of revolution has been undammed, but it must be channeled into the secure bed of evolution."
Hitler's speech signaled his intention to rein in the SA, whose ranks had grown rapidly in the early 1930s. This would not prove to be a simple task, however, as the SA constituted a large part of the most devoted followers of Nazism. The SA traced its dramatic rise in numbers in part to the onset of the Great Depression, when many Germans lost their jobs and faith in traditional institutions. While Nazism was not exclusively â€“ or even primarily â€“ a working class phenomenon, the SA fulfilled the yearning of many workers for both class solidarity and nationalist fervor. Many stormtroopers believed in the socialist promise of National Socialism and expected the Nazi regime to take more radical economic action, such as breaking up the vast landed estates of the aristocracy. That the regime did not take such steps disillusioned those who expected an economic as well as a political revolution.
 Conflict between the Army and the SA
No one in the SA spoke more loudly for "a continuation of the German revolution", as one prominent stormtrooper put it, than RÃ¶hm. RÃ¶hm, as one of the earliest members of the Nazi Party, had participated in the Munich Beer Hall Putsch, an attempt by Hitler to seize power by force in 1923. A combat veteran of World War I, RÃ¶hm had recently boasted that he would execute 12 men in retaliation for the killing of any stormtrooper. RÃ¶hm saw violence as a means to political ends. He took seriously the socialist promise of National Socialism, and demanded that Hitler and the other party leaders initiate wide-ranging socialist reform in Germany.
Not content solely with the leadership of the SA, RÃ¶hm lobbied Hitler to appoint him Minister of Defence, a position held by the conservative General Werner von Blomberg. Although nicknamed the "Rubber Lion" by some of his critics in the army for his devotion to Hitler, Blomberg was not himself a Nazi, and therefore represented a bridge between the army and the party. Blomberg and many of his fellow officers were recruited from the Prussian nobility, and regarded the SA as a plebeian rabble that threatened the army's traditional high status in German society.
If the regular army showed contempt for the masses belonging to the SA, many stormtroopers returned the feeling, seeing the army as insufficiently committed to the National Socialist revolution. Max Heydebreck, an SA leader in Rummelsburg, denounced the army to his fellow brownshirts, telling them, "Some of the officers of the army are swine. Most officers are too old and have to be replaced by young ones. We want to wait till Papa Hindenburg is dead, and then the SA will march against the army."
Despite such hostility between the brownshirts and the regular army, Blomberg and others in the military saw the SA as a source of raw recruits for an enlarged and revitalised army. RÃ¶hm, however, wanted to eliminate the generalship of the Prussian aristocracy altogether, using the SA to become the core of a new German military. Limited by the Treaty of Versailles to one hundred thousand soldiers, army leaders watched anxiously as membership in the SA surpassed three million men by the beginning of 1934. In January 1934, RÃ¶hm presented Blomberg with a memorandum demanding that the SA replace the regular army as the nation's ground forces, and that the Reichswehr become a training adjunct to the SA.
In response, Hitler met with Blomberg and the leadership of the SA and SS on February 28, 1934. Under pressure from Hitler, RÃ¶hm reluctantly signed a pledge stating that he recognised the supremacy of the Reichswehr over the SA. Hitler announced to those present that the SA would act as an auxiliary to the Reichswehr, not the other way around. After Hitler and most of the army officers had left, however, RÃ¶hm declared that he would not take instructions from "the ridiculous corporal" â€“ a demeaning reference to Hitler. While Hitler did not take immediate action against RÃ¶hm for his intemperate outburst, it nonetheless deepened the rift between them.
 Growing pressure against the SA
Franz von Papen
, the conservative vice-chancellor who ran afoul of Hitler after denouncing the regime's failure to rein in the SA in his Marburg speech.
Despite his earlier agreement with Hitler, RÃ¶hm still clung to his vision of a new German army with the SA at its core. By early 1934, this vision directly conflicted with Hitler's plan to consolidate power and expand the Reichswehr. Because their plans for the army were mutually exclusive, RÃ¶hm's success could only come at Hitler's expense.
Moreover it wasn't just the Reichswehr that viewed the SA as a threat. Several of Hitler's lieutenants feared RÃ¶hm's growing power and restlessness, as did Hitler himself. As a result, a political struggle within the party grew, with those closest to Hitler, including Prussian premier Hermann GÃ¶ring, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, SS Chief Heinrich Himmler, and Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess, positioning themselves against RÃ¶hm.
While all of these men were veterans of the Nazi movement, only RÃ¶hm continued to demonstrate his independence from, rather than his loyalty to, Adolf Hitler. RÃ¶hm's contempt for the party's bureaucracy angered Hess. SA violence in Prussia gravely concerned GÃ¶ring, Minister-President of Prussia. As a means of isolating RÃ¶hm, on April 20, 1934 GÃ¶ring transferred control of the Prussian political police (Gestapo) to Himmler, who, GÃ¶ring believed, could be counted on to move against RÃ¶hm. Himmler envied the independence and power of the SA, although by this time he and his deputy Reinhard Heydrich had already begun restructuring the SS from a bodyguard formation for Nazi leaders (and a subset of the SA) into its own independent elite corps, one loyal to both himself and Hitler. The loyalty of the SS men would prove useful to both when Hitler finally chose to move against RÃ¶hm and the SA.
Demands for Hitler to constrain the SA strengthened. Conservatives in the army, industry, and politics placed Hitler under increasing pressure to reduce the influence of the SA and to move against RÃ¶hm. While RÃ¶hm's homosexuality did not endear him to conservatives, they were more concerned about his political ambitions. On June 17, 1934, conservative demands for Hitler to act came to a head when Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, confidant of the ailing Hindenburg, gave a speech at Marburg University warning of the threat of a "second revolution". Privately, von Papen, a Catholic aristocrat with ties to army and industry, threatened to resign if Hitler did not act. While von Papen's resignation as vice-chancellor would not threaten Hitler's position, it would nonetheless be an embarrassing display of independence from a leading conservative.
In response to conservative pressure to constrain RÃ¶hm, Hitler left for Neudeck to meet with Hindenburg. Blomberg, who had been meeting with the President, uncharacteristically reproached Hitler for not having moved against RÃ¶hm earlier. He then told Hitler that Hindenburg was close to declaring martial law and turning the government over to the Reichswehr if Hitler did not take immediate steps against RÃ¶hm and his brownshirts. Hitler had hesitated for months in moving against RÃ¶hm, in part due to RÃ¶hm's visibility as the leader of a national militia with millions of members. However, the threat of a declaration of martial law from Hindenburg, the only person in Germany with the authority to potentially depose the Nazi regime, put Hitler under pressure to act. He left Neudeck with the intention of both destroying RÃ¶hm and settling scores with old enemies. Both Himmler and GÃ¶ring welcomed Hitler's decision, since both had much to gain by RÃ¶hm's downfall â€“ the independence of the SS for Himmler, and the removal of a rival for the future command of the army for GÃ¶ring.
In preparation for the purge both Himmler and his deputy Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the SS Security Service, assembled a dossier of manufactured evidence to suggest that RÃ¶hm had been paid twelve million marks by France to overthrow Hitler. Leading officers in the SS were shown falsified evidence on June 24 that RÃ¶hm planned to use the SA to launch a plot against the government (RÃ¶hm-Putsch). GÃ¶ring, Himmler, Heydrich, and Victor Lutze (at Hitler's direction) drew up lists of people in and outside the SA to be killed. One of the men GÃ¶ring recruited to assist him was Willi Lehmann, a Gestapo official and NKVD spy. On June 27, Hitler moved to secure the army's cooperation. Blomberg and General Walther von Reichenau, the army's liaison to the party, gave it to him by expelling RÃ¶hm from the German Officers' League, and placing the army on alert. Hitler felt confident enough in his position to attend a wedding reception in Essen, although he appeared somewhat agitated and preoccupied. From there he called RÃ¶hm's adjutant at Bad Wiessee and ordered SA leaders to meet with him on June 30.
The architects of the purge: Hitler, GÃ¶ring, Goebbels, and Hess. Only Himmler and Heydrich are missing.
At about 4:30 on the morning of June 30, 1934, Hitler and his entourage flew into Munich. From the airport they drove to the Bavarian Interior Ministry, where they assembled the leaders of an SA rampage that had taken place in city streets the night before. Enraged, Hitler tore the epaulets off the shirt of ObergruppenfÃ¼hrer Schneidhuber, the chief of the Munich police, for failing to keep order in the city on the previous night. He shouted at him that he would be shot. Schneidhuber was executed later that day. As the stormtroopers were hustled off to prison, Hitler assembled a large group of SS and regular police, and departed for the Hanselbauer Hotel in Bad Wiessee, where Ernst RÃ¶hm and his followers were staying.
At Bad Wiessee, Hitler personally placed RÃ¶hm and other high-ranking SA leaders under arrest. According to Erich Kempka, one of the men present during the raid, Hitler turned RÃ¶hm over to "two detectives holding pistols with the safety catch removed", and the SS found Breslau SA leader Edmund Heines in bed with a (male) unidentified eighteen-year-old SA senior troop leader. Goebbels emphasised the latter in subsequent propaganda justifying the purge as a crackdown on moral turpitude. Both Heines and his partner were shot on the spot in the hotel grounds on the personal order of Hitler. Meanwhile, the SS arrested a number of SA leaders as they departed their train for a planned meeting with RÃ¶hm.
The fact that no plot by RÃ¶hm to overthrow the regime ever existed did not prevent Hitler from denouncing the leadership of the SA. Arriving back at party headquarters in Munich, Hitler addressed the assembled crowd. Consumed with rage, Hitler denounced "the worst treachery in world history". Hitler told the crowd that "undisciplined and disobedient characters, and asocial or diseased elements" would be annihilated. The crowd, which included party members and many SA members fortunate enough to escape arrest, shouted its approval. Hess, present among the assembled, even volunteered to shoot the "traitors" himself. Joseph Goebbels, who had been with Hitler at Bad Wiessee, set the final phase of the plan in motion. Upon returning to Berlin, he telephoned GÃ¶ring with the codeword Kolibri to let loose the execution squads on the rest of their unsuspecting victims.
 Against conservatives and old enemies
The regime did not limit itself to a purge of the SA, however. Having earlier imprisoned or exiled prominent Social Democrats and Communists, Hitler used the occasion to move against conservatives he considered unreliable. This included Vice-Chancellor Papen and those in his immediate circle. In Berlin, on GÃ¶ring's personal orders, an armed SS unit stormed the Vice-Chancellery. Gestapo officers attached to the SS unit shot Papen's secretary Herbert von Bose without bothering to arrest him first. The Gestapo arrested and later executed Papen's close associate Edgar Jung, the author of Papen's Marburg speech; they disposed of his body by dumping it in a ditch. The Gestapo also murdered Erich Klausener, the leader of Catholic Action, and a close Papen associate. The vice-chancellor himself was unceremoniously arrested at the vice-chancellery, despite his insistent protests that he could not be arrested. Although Hitler ordered him released days later, Papen no longer dared to criticise the regime.
Hitler, Hermann GÃ¶ring, and Himmler unleashed the Gestapo against old enemies as well. Both Kurt von Schleicher, Hitler's predecessor as chancellor, and his wife were murdered at their home. Others killed included Gregor Strasser, a former Nazi who had angered Hitler by resigning from the party in 1932, and Gustav Ritter von Kahr, the former Bavarian state commissioner who crushed the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923. Kahr's fate was especially gruesome. His body was found in a wood outside Munich; he had been hacked to death, apparently with pickaxes. The murdered included at least one accidental victim: Willi Schmid, the music critic of the MÃ¼nchner Neuste Nachrichten, a Munich newspaper. The Gestapo mistook him for Ludwig Schmitt, a past supporter of Otto Strasser, the brother of Gregor. Such unrestrained violence added to the fearsome reputation of the Gestapo, the Nazis' secret police.
 RÃ¶hm's fate
RÃ¶hm was held briefly at Stadelheim Prison in Munich, while Hitler considered his fate. Certainly, Ernst RÃ¶hm's service to the Nazi regime counted for something. On the other hand, he could not be held in prison indefinitely or exiled, and a public trial might bring unwanted scrutiny to the purge. In the end, Hitler decided that RÃ¶hm had to die. On July 2, at Hitler's behest, Theodor Eicke, later the commandant of the Dachau concentration camp, and SS Officer Michel Lippert visited RÃ¶hm. Once inside RÃ¶hm's cell, they handed him a loaded Browning pistol, and told him that he had ten minutes to kill himself, or else they would do it for him. RÃ¶hm demurred, telling them, "If I am to be killed, let Adolf do it himself." Having heard nothing in the allotted time, they returned to RÃ¶hm's cell to find him standing, with his bare chest puffed out in a gesture of defiance. Lippert shot him dead at point-blank range. Years later, in 1957, the German authorities tried Lippert in Munich for RÃ¶hm's murder. Until then, Lippert had been one of the few executioners of the purge to have escaped justice.
Hitler triumphant: The FÃ¼hrer
reviewing SA in 1935. In the car with Hitler: the Blutfahne
, behind the car SS-man Jakob Grimminger
As the purge claimed the lives of so many prominent Germans, it could hardly be kept secret. At first, its architects seemed split on how to handle the event. GÃ¶ring instructed police stations to burn "all documents concerning the action of the past two days". Meanwhile, Goebbels tried to prevent newspapers from publishing lists of the dead, but at the same time used a July 2 radio address to describe how Hitler had narrowly prevented RÃ¶hm and Schleicher from overthrowing the government and throwing the country into turmoil. Then, on July 13, 1934, Hitler justified the purge in a nationally-broadcast speech to the Reichstag:
In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people. I gave the order to shoot the ringleaders in this treason, and I further gave the order to cauterise down to the raw flesh the ulcers of this poisoning of the wells in our domestic life. Let the nation know that its existenceâ€”which depends on its internal order and securityâ€”cannot be threatened with impunity by anyone! And let it be known for all time to come that if anyone raises his hand to strike the State, then certain death is his lot.
Concerned with presenting the massacre as legally sanctioned, Hitler had the cabinet approve a measure on July 3 that declared, "The measures taken on June 30, July 1 and 2 to suppress treasonous assaults are legal as acts of self-defense by the State." Reich Justice Minister Franz GÃ¼rtner, a conservative who had been Bavarian Justice Minister in the years of the Weimar Republic, demonstrated his loyalty to the new regime by drafting the statute, which added a legal veneer to the purge. Signed into law by Hitler, GÃ¼rtner and Minister of the Interior Wilhelm Frick, the "Law Regarding Measures of State Self-Defense" retroactively legalised the murders committed during the purge. Germany's legal establishment further capitulated to the regime when the country's leading legal scholar, Carl Schmitt, wrote an article defending Hitler's July 13 speech. It was named "The FÃ¼hrer Upholds the Law".
Almost unanimously, the army applauded the Night of the Long Knives, even though the generals Kurt von Schleicher and Ferdinand von Bredow were among the victims. The ailing President Hindenburg, Germany's highly-revered military hero, sent a telegram expressing his "profoundly felt gratitude" and he congratulated Hitler for 'nipping treason in the bud'. General von Reichenau went so far as to publicly give credence to the lie that Schleicher had been plotting to overthrow the government. The army's support for the purge, however, would have far-reaching consequences for the institution. The humbling of the SA ended the threat it had posed to the army but, by standing by Hitler during the purge, the army bound itself more tightly to the Nazi regime. One retired captain, Erwin Planck, seemed to realise this: "if you look on without lifting a finger," he said to his friend, General Werner von Fritsch, "you will meet the same fate sooner or later." Another rare exception was Field Marshal August von Mackensen, who spoke about the murders of Schleicher and Bredow at the annual General Staff Society meeting in February 1935.
However, rumours about the Night of the Long Knives rapidly spread. Many Germans approached the official news of the events as described by Joseph Goebbels with a great deal of skepticism. At the same time, however, many others seemed prepared to take the regime at its word, and to believe that Hitler had saved Germany from a descent into chaos. Luise Solmitz, a Hamburg schoolteacher, echoed the sentiments of many Germans when she cited Hitler's "personal courage, decisiveness and effectiveness" in her private diary. She even compared him to Frederick the Great, the 18th century King of Prussia. Others were appalled at the scale of the executions and at the relative complacency of many of their fellow Germans. "A very calm and easygoing mailman," the diarist Victor Klemperer wrote, "who is not at all National Socialist, said, 'Well, he simply sentenced them.' " It did not escape Klemperer's notice that many of the victims had played a role in bringing Hitler to power. "A chancellor", he wrote, "sentences and shoots members of his own private army!" The extent of the massacre and the relative ubiquity of the Gestapo, however, meant that those who disapproved of the purge generally kept quiet about it.
Hitler named Victor Lutze to replace RÃ¶hm as head of the SA. Hitler ordered him, as one prominent historian described it, to put an end to "homosexuality, debauchery, drunkenness, and high living" in the SA. Hitler expressly told him to stop SA funds from being spent on limousines and banquets, which he considered evidence of SA extravagance. A weak man, Lutze did little to assert the SA's independence in the coming years, and the SA gradually lost its power in Hitler's Germany. The regime had all of the decorative SA daggers ground to remove the name of RÃ¶hm from the blade, which was replaced with the words "Alles fÃ¼r Deutschland" (Everything for Germany). Membership in the organisation plummeted from 2.9 million in August 1934 to 1.2 million in April 1938.
The Night of the Long Knives represented a triumph for Hitler, and a turning point for the German government. It established Hitler as "the supreme judge of the German people", as he put it in his July 13 speech to the Reichstag. Later, in April 1942, Hitler would formally adopt this title, thus placing himself de jure as well as de facto above the reach of the law. Centuries of jurisprudence proscribing extra-judicial killings were swept aside. Despite some initial efforts by local prosecutors to take legal action against those who carried out the murders, which the regime rapidly quashed, it appeared that no law would constrain Hitler in his use of power. The Night of the Long Knives also sent a clear message to the public that even the most prominent Germans were not immune to arrest or even summary execution should the Nazi regime perceive them as a threat. In this manner, the purge established a pattern of violence that would characterise the Nazi regime: the use of force to establish an empire.
 See also
- ^ Kershaw (1998) p.508
- ^ a b c Evans (2005), p. 39. "At least eighty-five people are known to have been summarily killed without any formal legal proceedings being taken against them. GÃ¶ring alone had over a thousand people arrested."
- ^ Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 517. "The names of eighty-five victims [exist], only fifty of them SA men. Some estimates, however, put the total number killed at between 150 and 200."
- ^ Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 515.
- ^ ""RÃ¶hm-Putsch"". Deutsches Historisches Museum (DHM), German Historical Museum. http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/nazi/innenpolitik/roehm/index.html. Retrieved 2007-10-14.
- ^ In the November 1932 parliamentary elections, the Nazi Party won 196 seats in the Reichstag out of a possible 584. The Nazis were the largest party in the legislature but were still considerably short of a majority.
- ^ Through the Enabling Act of 1933 Hitler arrogated the nation's legislative power and was thereafter effectively able to rule through promulgation of decrees that avoided the legislative processes of the Weimar Constitution
- ^ Reiche (2002), pp. 120â€“121.
- ^ Toland (1976), p. 266.
- ^ Shirer (1960), p. 165.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 23.
- ^ Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 501
- ^ Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 435
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 20.
- ^ Schoenbaum, (1997) pp. 35â€“42. "The most general theoryâ€”that National Socialism was a revolution of the lower middle classâ€”is defensible but inadequate."
- ^ Bullock (1958), p. 80. "But in origin the National Socialists had been a radical anti-capitalist party, and this part of the National Socialist programme was not only taken seriously by many loyal Party members but was of increasing importance in a period of economic depression. How seriously Hitler took the socialist character of National Socialism was to remain one of the main causes of disagreement and division within the Nazi party up to the summer of 1934."
- ^ Frei (1987), p. 126. The quote is attributed to Breslau SA Chief Edmund Heines.
- ^ Frei (1987), p. 13.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 24.
- ^ Wheeler-Bennett (2005), pp. 712â€“739.
- ^ Bessel (1984), p. 97.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 22.
- ^ Wheeler-Bennett (2005), p. 726.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 26.
- ^ Martin and Pedley (2005), p. 33.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 29.
- ^ Papen (1953), pp. 308â€“312.
- ^ Papen (1953), p. 309.
- ^ Wheeler-Bennett (2005), pp. 319â€“320.
- ^ a b Evans (2005), p. 31.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 30.
- ^ O'Neill (1967), p. 72â€“80.
- ^ Bullock (1958) p. 165.
- ^ a b c d Shirer (1960), p. 221.
- ^ Bullock (1958), p. 166.
- ^ Kempka interview.
- ^ a b c Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 514.
- ^ a b Evans (2005), p. 32.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 34.
- ^ Evans (2005), pp. 33â€“34.
- ^ Spielvogel (2005) pp. 78â€“79.
- ^ a b Evans (2005), p. 36.
- ^ Ironically, Hitler himself had been incarcerated at Stadelheim Prison for about five weeks following the Nazi's disruption of an opposing party's political rally in January 1921.
- ^ Fest, Joachim (1974). Hitler. Harcourt. pp. 458.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 33.
- ^ Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 517.
- ^ Fest (1974), p. 469.
- ^ Fest (1974), p. 468.
- ^ GÃ¼rtner also declared in cabinet that the measure did not in fact create any new law, but simply confirmed the existing law. If that was indeed true then, as a legal matter, the law was entirely unnecessary and redundant. Kershaw p. 518.
- ^ Evans, Richard (2005). The Third Reich in Power. Penguin Group. pp. 72.
- ^ Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 519.
- ^ Fest (1974), p. 470.
- ^ Martin and Pedley (2005), p. 33â€“34.
- ^ HÃ¶hne (1970), pp. 113â€“118.
- ^ SchwarzmÃ¼ller, 299â€“306.
- ^ Kershaw, Myth, (2001), p. 87. "It was plain that there was wide acceptance of the deliberately misleading propaganda put out by the regime."
- ^ Klemperer (1998), p.74.
- ^ a b Kershaw, Hitler, (1999), p. 520.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 40.
- ^ Evans (2005), p. 72. "After the 'Night of the Long Knives,' [Reich Minister for Justice Franz GÃ¼rtner] nipped in the bud the attempts of some local state prosecutors to initiate proceedings against the killers."
- Bessel, Richard. Political Violence and the Rise of Nazism: The Storm Troopers in Eastern Germany 1925â€“1934. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984. ISBN 0-300-03171-8.
- Bullock, Alan. Hitler: A Study in Tyranny. New York: Harper, 1958.
- Collier, Martin and Pedley, Phillip. Hitler and the Nazi State. New York: Harcourt, 2005. ISBN 0-435-32709-7.
- Evans, Richard. The Third Reich in Power. New York: Penguin Group, 2005. ISBN 0-14-303790-0.
- Fest, Joachim. Hitler. New York: Harcourt, 1974. ISBN 0-15-602754-2.
- Frei, Norbert. National Socialist Rule in Germany: The FÃ¼hrer State 1933â€“1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. ISBN 0-631-18507-0.
- HÃ¶hne, Heinz. The Order of the Death's Head: The Story of Hitler's SS. New York: Coward-McCann, 1970. ISBN 0-14-139012-3.
- Kempka, Erich. Library of Congress: Adolf Hitler Collection, C-89, 9376-88A-B, Erich Kempka interview, October 15, 1971.
- Kershaw, Ian. Hitler: 1889â€“1936 Hubris. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1999. ISBN 0-393-32035-9.
- Kershaw, Ian. The "Hitler Myth": Image and Reality in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0-19-280206-2.
- Klemperer, Victor. I Will Bear Witness: The diaries of Victor Klemperer. New York: Random House, 1998. ISBN 0-679-45969-1.
- O'Neill, Robert. The German Army and the Nazi Party 1933â€“1939. New York: James H Heineman, 1967. ISBN 0-685-11957-2.
- Reiche, Eric G. The Development of the SA in NÃ¼rnberg, 1922â€“1934. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-521-52431-8.
- Schoenbaum, David. Hitler's Social Revolution: Class and Status in Nazi Germany, 1933â€“1939. W. W. Norton & Company, 1997. ISBN 0-393-31554-1.
- SchwarzmÃ¼ller, Theo. Zwischen Kaiser und "FÃ¼hrer": Generalfeldmarschall August von Mackensen, eine politische Biographie. Paderborn: Dtv, 1995. ISBN 3-423-30823-0.
- Shirer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960. ISBN 0-671-72868-7.
- Spielvogel, Jackson J. Hitler and Nazi Germany: A History. New York: Prentice Hall, 1996. ISBN 0-13-189877-9.
- Toland, John. Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography. New York: Doubleday, 1976. ISBN 0-385-42053-6.
- Wheeler-Bennett, John. The Nemesis of Power: The German Army in Politics 1918â€“1945 Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd Edition, 2005. ISBN 1-4039-1812-0.
- Von Papen, Franz. Memoirs. London: Dutton, 1953. ASIN B0007DRFHQ
 Further reading
- Evans, Richard J.. The Coming of the Third Reich. New York: Penguin Group, 2004. ISBN 0-14-303469-3.
- Maracin, Paul The Night of the Long Knives: 48 Hours that Changed the History of the World, New York: The Lyons Press, 2004. ISBN 1-59921-070-3.
- Mau, Herman. "The 'Second Revolution'â€”June 30, 1934". In Republic to Reich: The Making of the Nazi Revolution, edited by Hajo Holborn. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972. ISBN 0-394-47122-9.
- Tolstoy, Nikolai. Night of the Long Knives. New York: Balantine Books, 1972. ISBN 0-345-02787-6.
 External links
This article is based on one or more articles in Wikipedia, with modifications and
additional content by SOURCES editors. This article is covered by a Creative Commons
Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License
(GFDL). The remainder of the content of this website, except where otherwise indicated,
is copyright SOURCES and may not be reproduced without written permission.
(For information call 416-964-7799 or use the
SOURCES.COM is an online portal and directory for journalists, news media, researchers
and anyone seeking experts, spokespersons, and reliable information resources. Use
SOURCES.COM to find experts, media contacts, news releases, background information,
scientists, officials, speakers, newsmakers, spokespeople, talk show guests, story
ideas, research studies, databases, universities, associations and NGOs, businesses,
government spokespeople. Indexing and search applications by Ulli Diemer and Chris
For information about being included in SOURCES as a expert or
spokesperson see the FAQ or use
the online membership form.
Check here for
information about becoming an
For partnerships, content and applications, and domain name opportunities
Sources home page