Home | News Releases | Calendar | Getting Publicity | Media Lists | Governments | Contact | Sources Select News RSS Feed |

News Release

Medical Reform Group Press Release Regarding Provincial Elections

August 29, 1990

In order to clarify the perspectives of the 3 main Ontario political parties towards health issues, the Medical Reform Group of Ontario submitted the enclosed questionnaire to the three parties (See appended, with replies). The MRG is a non-partisan organisation whose first founding principle is that health care with universal access is a right. In this press conference we highlight the differences among the three main parties on various issues. Though the Liberal Party did not respond its actions serve as a guide.

We note the recent re-emergence in the media of user fees as a proposed means to regulate access to health care and to cut costs. Studies have shown that user fees deter the needy and poor from seeking appropriate health care. We also note that the recent Lowy Commission (Pharmaceutical Enquiry) proposes implementing prescription co-payment charges up to $250 per year. The MRG strongly urges rejection of user fees in any guise.

The Liberal Government has taken steps towards abolition of user fees i.e. Bill 94 which bans Extra-Billing. However, we view with alarm the Liberals' intent to charge user fees for services supposedly outside the health care sector i.e. chronic care facilities. Furthermore, the Liberals have as yet made no attempt to prosecute physicians who currently violate Bill 94.

The Progressive Conservative Party has rejected any role for user fees in their reply to us. However, we note a contradiction between this, and Michael Harris' media remarks on the benefits of user fees. We are concerned that this vacillation may presage an unacceptable future endorsement of user fees by the PCP. Moreover, the PCP made no commitment at all on administrative charges, a form of extra-billing.

The New Democratic Party appears to be the only party consistently against user fees. They are also explicitly against administrative charges. They do note that in consultation with the medical profession they would be prepared to include some currently uninsured services within the schedule for billing. This closes the loopholes in Bill 94.


Noting the many documented links between poverty and ill health, the MRG advocates significant poverty relief measures.

The Liberal Government has actually cut assistance to food banks. It has, moreover, not made any commitment to increasing the level of the minimum wage.

The Progressive Conservative Party would reverse the cuts in the food bank programme. They make no commitment on minimum wages.

The New Democratic Party would also reverse the cuts to the food banks. But in addition they would enhance the current minimum wage.

Subject Headings: Abortion Rights Community Health Community Health Centres Drug Substitution Epidemiology Epidemiology/Community Medicine Health Administration Health Care Budgets Health Care Cost Containment Health Care Costs Health Care Delivery Health Care Finance & Fund-Raising Health Care in Canada Health Care in Ontario Health Care in the U.K. Health Care in the U.S. Health Care Myths Health Care Reform Health Care Resources Health Care Services Health Care Workers Health Clinics Health Determinants Health Economics Health Expenditures Health Issues Health Policy Health Policy/SeniorsHealth Service Organizations Health/Social Justice Issues Health Statistics Health/Strategic Planning History Hospitals Labour Medicine Medical Associations Medical Costs/Foreign Medical Education Medical Ethics Medical Human Resources Medical Personnel Medical Research Funding Medicare Medication Use Medication Use/Seniors NAFTA/Health Occupational Health & Safety Patients' Rights Pharmaceuticals Physician Compensation Physician Human Resources Pro-Choice Issues Public Health Publications/Health Social Policy Women's Health

Toronto, Ontario, , Canada         Tel:
Copyright © Sources, All rights reserved.